Obama’s pledge to gay soldiers

By Derrick Z. Jackson

February 3, 2009

DON’T ASK too soon, our new pragmatic president says, if you want to do away with “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The Globe reported this week that President Obama wants to cooly build irrefutable facts to support ending the ban on openly gay and lesbian soldiers, and break down old attitudes in the Pentagon and among politicians. Many gay activists seem prepared to give Obama at least a few months. Rea Carey, president of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said, “We’re not worried we’ll be left behind.”

Discuss
COMMENTS (94)

Cool pragmatism is getting a chance, especially given how the molten lava of President Clinton flamed out.

During his 1992 campaign, Clinton spoke before 600 mostly gay and lesbian supporters in Hollywood, then the biggest such gathering. The San Francisco Chronicle said Clinton “choked up” in his address. The Globe said “his eyes filled with tears.” In speaking about AIDS, he said he would give up his race for the White House “if I could wave my arm for those of you who are HIV-positive and make it go away tomorrow.” He was resolute on lifting the ban on homosexuals serving in the military.

A 1992 General Accounting Office report said the Defense Department expelled an average of 1,500 gay soldiers a year during the 1980s. The report said the Defense Department’s own reports concluded that “there was no factual data to substantiate” claims that homosexual solders were a particular security risk. One draft report compared the ban on gays to the former resistance to integrate black soldiers, commenting that none of the “dire consequences” and “predictions of doom” for discipline, group morale, and achieving military goals “has come true.”

Clinton knew that when he said, “Every day that we discriminate, that we hate, that we refuse to avail ourselves of the potential of any group of Americans, we are all less than we ought to be. This country is being killed by people who try to break us down and tear us down and make us little when we have to be big.” Clinton specifically said of the ban, “My fellow Americans, we have too much to do to endure quaint little rules. We can’t afford to waste the hearts and minds of the gays and lesbians.”

The quaint rules endured, as Pentagon and political backlash forced Clinton into the convoluted policy of upholding the ban but telling the military not to pry into personal affairs and essentially telling gay and lesbian soldiers to stay in the closet. It did not work. A follow-up Government Accountability Office report in 2005 found that expulsions were briefly cut in half in 1994 and 1995, but climbed back to over 1,100 a year in the last three years of the Clinton administration. Four out of five of the 9,500 total soldiers kicked out in the 10-year period from 1994 to 2003 were discharged simply for admitting they were gay.

The estimated replacement cost for these soldiers was $95 million. The loss of skills was priceless in a post-9/11 world, as 322 of the kicked-out soldiers could speak some levels of languages such as Arabic, Korean, Russian, Chinese, and Farsi.

The American people get this, as CNN and Washington Post polls last year found that 75 percent to 81 percent of Americans say openly gay soldiers should be allowed to serve. President Obama gets this, citing the 2005 GAO report on his new White House website, saying he “agrees with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili and other military experts that we need to repeal the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy. The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve.”

In his pre-inauguration speech at the Lincoln Memorial, Obama specifically mentioned gay Americans among the people he hoped Americans could “recognize ourselves in one another.” If Obama can get the military to recognize the value and valor of soldiers regardless of sexual orientation, even if it takes a few months more than the gauntlet of an executive order, cool pragmatism may be the new molten lava of true change.

Prop 8 protest San Francisco, CA

Conservatives Push Hard for Gay Marriage Ban

By Karen Ocamb, AlterNet. Posted October 16, 2008.

An influx of cash from the Religious Right has boosted the campaign for Prop. 8, pushing the anti-gay measure dangerously ahead in the polls.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell told MSNBC recently that the economic crisis would trump cultural issues in his battleground state Nov. 4. Blue-collar working-class families are trending for Democrat Barack Obama for president, he said, worried more about their budgets than Obama’s African-American race.

Obama’s Republican opponent, John McCain, on the other hand, is having difficulty with some of his angrier supporters who perceive Obama in various permutations of “the Other” — making him “dangerous,” as the National Republican Trust put it in an e-mail distributed by the conservative publication Newsmax.

But while the world watches the critical presidential match, there is another high-stakes culture clash being waged, pitting the gay community against the Religious Right. It is the battle over Proposition 8, an initiative on the California ballot that would eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry.

For gay people and their allies, the battle is not only about retaining the “fundamental” right to marry, as the California Supreme Court ruled May 15; it is also about not letting the majority vote to take away an existing right of the minority and thus adding to other disgraceful moments in American history, such as when the country tolerated Jim Crow laws and the Japanese internment, to name a few examples.

For the proponents of Prop. 8, however, the battle is “spiritual warfare,” with religious freedom and the nation itself at stake if same-sex marriage is allowed to survive and spread beyond California’s borders.

“If sexual freedom is the ultimate liberty, then you have to rewrite the Bill of Rights,” Chuck Colson, founder of the Prison Fellowship Ministries, says on a Yes on Proposition 8 video produced by the American Family Association for distribution to pastors and Christian activists. “This vote on whether we stop the gay marriage juggernaut in California is the Armageddon. We lose this — we’re going to lose in a lot of other ways, including freedom of religion.”

Click here for entire article

Are Democrats Throwing Gays Under the Bus?

With just over three weeks until the elections, it seems a pretty certain bet that most of the LGBT community will vote for Barack Obama and Joe Biden, though with curtailed enthusiasm after numerous missteps.

But electoral support does not mean surrendering the right to critique and hold the candidates or the Democratic Party accountable. Indeed, it is the obligation of citizenship to call out disparities between avowed principles and actions that conflict with those principles. If the actions are not corrected, at least the credit-card promises are de-mythologized and once starry-eyed voters will not be surprised when the disappointing compromise bills come due.

Click here for entire article

Left To Right: Barbra Streisand, Barack Obama

 
Barbra Streisand, Barack Obama
 
 

Barack Obama takes command of the presidential election surging ahead in just about every poll imaginable; Histrionically homophobic Oklahoma State Representative Sally Kern continues to defend her comparison of homosexuality to terrorism; Connecticut gives the ‘gay-okay’ to marriage equality; and Barbra Streisand and the Spielbergs co-host a mega-event supporting gay marriage in California.

Campaign Chatter…

If the polls from the last week are accurate, Republican presidential nominee John McCain has a big problem according to many pundits. As the U.S. economy continues to tank so does Sen. McCain’s campaign which was running strong against rival Barack Obama until Wall Street began to crumble.

But that all seems like ages ago doesn’t it?

Last Friday’s Gallup Poll marked the seventh straight day that Barack Obama had been at the 50-percent-or-above mark among voters. Friday’s polls also marked an incredible surge for Barack Obama who for the first time since he became the Democratic presidential nominee has scored and maintained a double digit lead over his Republican opponent for any significant period of time. Factor in Obama’s financial advantage and his plans for massive advertising, including a 30-minute primetime ad buy on the major networks, in the run up to the general election and it looks like John McCain is running out of time and Obama has this one sewn up.

Click here for Entire Article

Where McCain, Obama stand on the issues

By CALVIN WOODWARD – 1 hour ago

A look at where Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain stand on a selection of issues:

ABORTION

McCain: Opposes abortion rights. Has voted for abortion restrictions permissible under Roe v. Wade, and now says he would seek to overturn that guarantee of abortion rights. Would not seek constitutional amendment to ban abortion.

Obama: Favors abortion rights.

AFGHANISTAN

McCain: Favors unspecified boost in U.S. forces.

Obama: Would add about 7,000 troops to the U.S. force of 36,000, bringing the reinforcements from Iraq. Has threatened unilateral attack on high-value terrorist targets in Pakistan as they become exposed, “if Pakistan cannot or will not act” against them.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE

McCain: The co-author of McCain-Feingold campaign finance law is running his general campaign with public money and within its spending limits. He urged Obama to do the same. He applied for federal matching funds for primaries but later turned them down so he could spend more than the limits. The Federal Election Commission belatedly approved his decision to bypass the primary funds, but rejected McCain’s claim that he needed no such approval. He raised more than $160 million before having to stop to accept the $84 million in public money for the fall. McCain accepted primary campaign contributions from lobbyists.

Obama: The presidential campaign’s fundraising champion has brought in more than $450 million. He is raising private money for his general election, despite his proposal last year to accept public financing and its spending limits if the Republican nominee does, too. Obama refuses to accept money from federal lobbyists and has instructed the Democratic National Committee to do the same for its joint victory fund, an account that would benefit the nominee. Obama does accept money from state lobbyists and from family members of federal lobbyists.

Click here for entire article

McCain talks with DC gay paper

  by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2008-10-08
 
Republican presidential nominee John McCain told the Washington Blade this week that he appreciates the Log Cabin Republicans’ endorsement and hopes that gay voters will consider voting for him. But he also implied that he is skeptical about supporting the Employment Non-Discrimination Act ( ENDA ) and the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act, and he dodged a question about anti-gay nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court.The Human Rights Campaign issued a statement soon after the interview appeared on the newspaper’s Web site, saying McCain’s responses “do nothing but insult the intelligence of the LGBT community.”

Click Here for Entire Article

Cyndi Lauper talks about Politics

As I toured all over the country this summer with True Colors, I saw something in the eyes of the audience I have not seen in a very long time; it was hope. Each night as I talked about the power of voting, it was evident through their reactions that the crowd wanted to change how this country is run. That is the one good thing that President Bush has done in the past seven years—he has created a movement within the country to change how things are done in Washington, D.C. But, what mattered to me the most is that everyone cared enough about their own lives and the future to register and vote.

Click Here for Entire Story

The veep debate: Did they agree on marriage?

by Lisa Keen, Keen News Service
2008-10-08
Images for this article: (click on the thumbnail to see fullsize)
 
To hear debate moderator Gwen Ifill sum it up, the two vice-presidential candidates “agree” on gay marriage. But that’s not what all LGBT viewers concluded during Thursday night’s nationally televised debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Mo.After getting six questions on the economy and three questions on the environment, the vice-presidential nominees were asked about legal rights for same-sex couples. The question was awkwardly worded, but in the end, most LGBT viewers seemed impressed with the strength of Democrat Sen. Joe Biden’s answer and underimpressed with that of Republican Gov. Sarah Palin.

PBS Moderator Ifill asked the two candidates: “Do you support, as they do in Alaska, granting same-sex benefits to couples?” She probably meant “benefits to same-sex couples,” and she should have noted that those benefits are available only to state employees in Alaska and are available only because the state supreme court ordered the state to provide them.

She tossed the question first to Biden, who answered as if the moderator had asked about equal protection for gay and straight couples.

“Do I support granting same-sex benefits?” repeated Biden ( pictured ) . “Absolutely, positively.”

Click here for full article

Should McCain’s chief of staff have been outed?

Should McCain’s chief of staff have been outed?

Mccainoops365(Getty Images) Gay media has been abuzz with the reported outing of Mark Buse, Senate chief of staff for presidential candidate John McCain, as a gay man. Mike Signorile and lefty blogger Mike Rogers, who did the honors, rationalized that McCain opposes most gay rights issues (he did, however, oppose the Federal Marriage Amendment, calling marriage a states’ issue) and that any gay who works for him is some kind of big enabler.  Today, the Log Cabin Republicans responded:

“Mark Buse has been openly gay for years and has acknowledged as much,” blogged the Cabins’ Scott Tucker. “This political stunt . . . just proves what Log Cabin has been saying for years: John McCain is an inclusive Republican who hires the best people, regardless of sexual orientation.”

Neither McCain nor Buse has commented publicly. McCain, at least, has bigger problems: his move to delay Friday’s presidential debate to focus on the White House’s proposed $700 billion Wall Street bailout is being painted by some Democrats as cowardice, and every hour the U.S. economy hurls toiletward is liable to hurt the GOP.

What I wonder is, when picking top aides, do Republicans ever hire any straight people? I keep thinking of the Mark Foley scandal, and how it emerged that many gay aides (not to mention Dennis Hastert) knew the congressman might have congressional-page problems, and how hard they worked to keep it quiet.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.